The fool mocks single-issue voters while agonizing over the unknown unknowns of which candidates statements are better or worse for each individual issue, tempered by the likelihood they actually mean what they say or if it’s just politicking (Trump’s tariffs vs. Harris’ Price controls for example).
The enlightened voter just votes for the candidate who’s better for the one or two issues they actually care about.
If your single issue is animal welfare, I think this is a convincing argument to vote Harris.
The fool mocks single-issue voters while agonizing over the unknown unknowns of which candidates statements are better or worse for each individual issue, tempered by the likelihood they actually mean what they say or if it’s just politicking (Trump’s tariffs vs. Harris’ Price controls for example).
The enlightened voter just votes for the candidate who’s better for the one or two issues they actually care about.
If your single issue is animal welfare, I think this is a convincing argument to vote Harris.
Thank you for cutting through the noise on this!